After Napster:
Aimster, Gnutella, and Other Peer-to-Peer File Transfer Networks – Reading Assignment for March 3 class
First, please read the Napster case, 239 F.3d 1004 (9th
Cir. 2001). If you don’t want to go on Westlaw,
here’s a link: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=9th&navby=case&no=0016401&exact=1
If you would like a summary of the Napster case, see Joseph Sifferd’s note in the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice at 4 Vand.J.Ent.L.& Prac. 93. I’ll have hardcopies at class on Monday. This note also describes how Napster’s holding could exempt “pure peer-to-peer networks” from liability. Another short article on that subject is at http://www.lawtechjournal.com/notes/2002/10_020819_kwant.php.
Can these new peer-to-peer networks be held liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement under the reasoning of Napster?
A Dutch court has ruled that KaZaA
is lawful, although some of its users may download copyrighted works. Please read this decision at http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/BUMA_v_Kazaa/20020328_kazaa_appeal_judgment.html
A
Then, if you want to see some really funny parodies of Lars and James (of the band Metallica) in their quest to shut down Napster, go to http://www.campchaos.com/cartoons/napsterbad/napsterbad_56k.html. This links to the first in the “Napster Bad” cartoon series, but on the right of the screen are links to the other 8 cartoons. These files are not too large, but, if you can’t get them, it really is no big deal. Just a warning, these cartoons have strong language. So, if you are easily offended, don’t bother.